Watchtower Bible And Tract Society 1989
Written by John Carson
”You Should Believe in the Trinity“ lyrics by Gary Richardson
The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society's 31 page booklet, "Should You Believe in the Trinity?", was a popular and effective tool for JWs to hand out when someone claimed to believe in the Trinity.
Should you believe in the Trinity? They will say, No! The booklet's attacks on the Trinity doctrine starts early in its writings and continues all the way to the end.
How do they attack the Trinity doctrine?
You will find quotes from a variety of sources throughout
the booklet that will trouble the average reader. These quotes (from encyclopedias, dictionaries, early Church Fathers, etc.) paint an ugly picture of the Trinity doctrine, and gives the reader the idea that to believe such a doctrine is to dishonor
God. By the time the reader gets to the end of the booklet, they bring out their big guns, obviously with the intention of arousing fear in the reader:
"Soon, when God brings this present wicked system of things to its end, Trinitarian Christendom will be called to account. And she will be judged adversely for her God-dishonoring actions and
doctrines... It is he (Satan the Devil) who promotes such a false doctrine to 'blind the minds of unbelievers." [Should You Believe in the Trinity, page 31]
If I were to take the quotes and reasonings
as they are appear in "Should You Believe in the Trinity?" at face value, I would agree with the Watchtower Society and run away from the Trinity doctrine as fast as I can. But I suggest (PLEAD is a better word) that you
do not be too hasty. It would be a good idea if you check the quotes they print in the booklet for accuracy first. Did the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society quote their sources accurately? Or, are there misquotes in this booklet; and if so, are they
intentional? If they are found to be accurate, then it would be wise to reconsider whether or not to believe in the Trinity doctrine. However, if they misquoted their sources intentionally, then the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society is guilty of
misleading their readers by deception into not believing the Trinity doctrine.
consider a quote taken from "Should You Believe in the Trinity?" as an example to see if the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society had faithfully quoted it accurately. On page 5 (page 6 online), they quote from The Illustrated Bible Dictionary:
A PROTESTANT publication states: "The word Trinity is not found in the Bible... It did not find a place formally in the theology of the church till the 4th century."
How this reads makes it appear that the publication they quoted from, admits the Trinity doctrine did not
develop until the 4th century. But was the above quoted accurately? Did the Watchtower leave anything out that we should know about? Let's read it again... but this time we'll add the missing pieces. The maroon texts are what the booklet quoted, the green texts are what they did not want you to see. Here is the actual quote from the New Bible Dictionary, J. D. Douglas & F. F. Bruce, Trinity, p 1298:
"The word Trinity is not found in the Bible, and
though used by Tertullian in the last decade of the 2nd century, it did not find a place formally in the theology of the church till the 4th century. It is, however, the distinctive and all-comprehensive doctrine of the Christian faith. It makes three affirmations: that there is
but one God, that the Father, the Son and the Spirit is each God, and that the Father, the Son and the Spirit is each a distinct Person. In this form it has become
the faith of the church since it received its full formulation at the hands of Tertullian, Athanasius and Augustine."
Notice that the quote from the booklet left out a crucial point. Why? Because the Watchtower Society argues that the Trinity doctrine was developed in the 4th century, and was not believed by the early Church Fathers. If the doctrine of the Trinity
was believed by them (the early Church Fathers) prior to the 4th century, then the Watchtower's claim of later developement is false.
After providing quotes taken
out of context from early Church Fathers on page 7, they claim the Trinity doctrine began to developed after the convening of the Council of Constantinople in 381 C.E. On page 8
“For the first time, Christendom’s Trinity began to come
into focus.” [Should You Believe
in the Trinity?, page 8]
Was it really the first time? Not at all! The Illustrated Bible
Dictionary, as we have seen, actually affirms the early Church Fathers taught the Trinity. One such example is Origen, who died about 131 years prior to this supposed beginnings of Trinitarianism. In his teachings, Origen referred
to “the authority of the most excellent Trinity” and that "nothing in the Trinity can be called greater or less".
[Origen De Principiis, Book 1, "On The Holy Spirit", paragraphs 2, 7, p. 257]
Where did Origen get the doctrine of the Trinity from? None other than the Holy Bible!
Notice who he identifies as the Almighty “which is to come” from. He quotes Revelation 1:8 and 4:8:
that you may understand that the omnipotence of Father and Son is one and the same, as God and the Lord are one and the same with the Father, listen to the manner in which John speaks in the Apocalypse: “Thus
says the Lord God, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.” For who else was “He which is to come” than Christ? And as no one ought to be offended, seeing God is the Father,
that the Saviour is also God; so also, since the Father is called omnipotent, no one ought to be offended that the Son of God is also called omnipotent.”
[Origen De Principiis, Book 1, "On Christ". paragraphh 10, page 250]
The last page in their booklet teaches, "Reject the Trinity - THERE can be no compromise with
God’s truths. Hence, to worship God on his terms means to reject the Trinity doctrine".
The Watchtower's President taught in their October, 2018 JW Broadcast, "You see, we are under
obligation to. . . . expose false teachings that misrepresent Jehovah; and a classic example of an unscriptural dogma that God’s people have exposed, is the Trinity." Yet
they stopped printing and distributing them door to door nor are they available in their carts. Seems what had been exposed, is not only their misquotes
and lies, but also how they define the Trinity (see Three Gods?
for more information).